Do you use AI to write assignments?

No. All our assignments are written by real human experts. We do not use AI or bots to generate content, ensuring your work is original, accurate, and tailored to your academic needs.

How affordable is your assignment help service?

Our prices are at least 10% cheaper than most assignment help companies in Australia. If you find a lower quote elsewhere, we'll match the price without compromising on quality.

Can I get help with urgent assignments?

Yes. We offer last-minute assignment help with delivery as fast as 6–12 hours depending on the subject and length. Our team works around the clock to meet your deadline.

Do you follow the assignment rubric while working on the order?

Yes. We strictly follow the assignment rubric to ensure that all grading criteria, instructions, and formatting requirements are fully met.

Can you guarantee plagiarism-free assignments?

Absolutely. All assignments are written from scratch and go through both plagiarism and AI detection tools to ensure 100% originality and academic integrity.

What if I need revisions or changes to my assignment?

We offer free unlimited revisions. If you need changes based on feedback or want additions, our team will gladly revise your work until you're fully satisfied.

How do I ensure the confidentiality of my personal information?

We use strict privacy measures and encrypted systems to ensure that your personal data is never shared with third parties and remains fully protected.

What if I'm not satisfied?

If you're not happy with the assignment and we can't resolve your concerns, you're entitled to a refund according to our money-back policy.

How can I make a payment?

You can make secure payments through PayPal, debit cards, or credit cards using our encrypted payment gateway.

Read: NRSG374 AT1 Rubric: Professional Development Resource

Topic

NRSG374 AT1 Rubric: Professional Development Resource

Subject

Nursing

Date

10th Jun 2025

Pages

Microsoft Word - NRSG374 AT1 Rubric_Final

NRSG374 AT1 Rubric: Professional Development Resource

Total marks 100, Weighting 50%.

Criterion (Weighting)	HD (85-100%)	DI (75-84%)	CR (65-74%)	PA (50-64%	NN (<50%)
Introduction to presentation, palliative care, and National Palliative Care Standards 10%	8.5 -10	7.5 – 8.4	6.5 – 7.4	5 – 6.4	0 – 4.9
	Introduction includes who the presenter is, what they will be presenting (setting clear learning outcomes for audience) and their target audience. A comprehensive outline of palliative care is provided, followed by an in-depth overview of the National Palliative Care Standards. Information is seamlessly supported by a wide range of relevant and credible nursing related sources.	Introduction includes who the presenter is, what they will be presenting (setting clear learning outcomes for audience) and their target audience. A well-developed outline of palliative care is provided, followed by a thorough overview of the National Palliative Care Standards. Information is supported by a range of relevant and credible nursing related sources.	Introduction includes who the presenter is and what they will be presenting. A clear outline of what palliative care is, followed by an overview of the National Palliative care standards. Information is supported by mostly credible nursing related sources.	Introduction includes who the presenter is. What palliative care is, and the National Palliative care standards are discussed. Information is supported by some credible nursing related sources (minimum 2 references).	Presenter does not introduce themselves and/or what they are presenting. Palliative care and/or the National Palliative Care Standards are not discussed. Information supported by less than 2 credible sources. No nursing related sources included.
	End-stage heart failure (ESHF) overview, illness trajectory and lifespan factors 10%	8.5 -10	7.5 – 8.4	6.5 – 7.4	5 – 6.4	0 – 4.9
A comprehensive outline of ESHF and its impact nationally. Information presented fully integrates the understanding of illness trajectory and lifespan factors (use of a nursing model. Information is seamlessly supported by a wide range of relevant and credible nursing related sources.		A well-developed outline of ESHF and its impact nationally. Information presented fully integrates the understanding of illness trajectory and lifespan factors (use of a nursing model) Information is supported by a range of relevant and credible nursing related sources	An outline of ESHF is presented including a clear understanding of ESHF Information presented integrates the understanding of illness trajectory and lifespan factors (use of a nursing model Information is supported by mostly credible nursing related sources	An outline of ESHF is presented including a basic understanding of ESHF Information presented integrates the understanding of illness trajectory and lifespan factors (use of a nursing model Information is supported by some credible nursing related sources (minimum 2 references)	An understanding of ESHF is not provided or ESFH illness trajectory and lifespan factors are not discussed. Information is supported by less than 2 credible sources No nursing related sources included.

Criterion (Weighting)	HD (85-100%)	DI (75-84%)	CR (65-74%)	PA (50-64%	NN (<50%)
Pathophysiology Terminal phase of either Fluid Overload OR Breathing difficulties 10%	8.5 -10	7.5 – 8.4	6.5 – 7.4	5 – 6.4	0 – 4.9
	A concise and comprehensive outline of the pathophysiology of the chosen sign is presented. Outline seamlessly linked to observable signs and supported by a wide range of relevant and credible nursing related sources.	A concise and well- developed outline of the pathophysiology of the chosen sign is presented. Outline clearly linked to observable signs and supported by a range of relevant and credible nursing related sources.	A clear outline of the pathophysiology of the chosen sign is presented. Outline linked to observable signs and supported by mostly credible nursing related sources.	A basic outline of the pathophysiology of the chosen sign is presented. Outline supported by some credible nursing related sources. (minimum 1 reference)	An unclear outline of the pathophysiology of the chosen sign is presented. No credible sources used. No nursing related sources included.
	Assessment and nursing care – Physical (Terminal phase of care) 20%	17 - 20	15 – 16.9	13 – 14.9	10 – 12.9	0 – 9.9
Comprehensive and highly relevant assessment and care strategies are presented. One (1) pharmacological AND one (1) non-pharmacological strategy to support chosen sign are comprehensively discussed. Strongly linked to one (1) National Palliative Care Standard. Information supported by a wide range of relevant and credible nursing related sources.		Well-developed and relevant assessment and care strategies are presented. One (1) pharmacological AND one (1) non-pharmacological strategy to support chosen sign are broadly discussed. Strongly linked to one (1) National Palliative Care Standard. Information supported by a range of relevant and credible nursing related sources.	Clear and relevant assessment and care strategies are presented. One (1) pharmacological AND one (1) non- pharmacological strategy to support chosen sign are clearly discussed. Clearly linked to one (1) National Palliative Care Standard. Information supported by mostly credible nursing related sources.	Relevant assessment and care strategies are presented. One (1) pharmacological AND one (1) non-pharmacological strategy to support chosen sign are presented. Poorly linked to one (1) National Palliative Care Standard. Information supported by some credible nursing related sources. (minimum 4 references)	Assessment and care strategies presented are not relevant. One (1) pharmacological OR/AND one (1) non- pharmacological strategy to support chosen sign from pathophysiology section are not presented. Not linked to one (1) National Palliative Care Standard. Information supported by less than 4 credible references. No nursing related sources included.

Criterion (Weighting)	HD (85-100%)	DI (75-84%)	CR (65-74%)	PA (50-64%	NN (<50%)
Assessment and nursing care – Psychosocial (Terminal phase of care) 20%	17 - 20	15 – 16.9	13 – 14.9	10 – 12.9	0 – 9.9
	Comprehensive and highly relevant assessment and care strategies are presented. One (1) person- centred AND one (1) family/carer centred strategy to support terminal phase are comprehensively discussed. Strongly linked to one (1) National Palliative Care Standard. Information supported by a wide range of relevant and credible nursing related sources.	Well-developed and relevant assessment and care strategies are presented. One (1) person- centred AND one (1) family/carer centred strategy to support terminal phase are broadly discussed. Strongly linked to one (1) National Palliative Care Standard. Information supported by a range of relevant and credible nursing related sources.	Clear and relevant assessment and care strategies are presented. One (1) person-centred AND one (1) family/carer centred strategy to support terminal phase are clearly discussed. Linked to one (1) National Palliative Care Standard. Information supported by mostly credible nursing related sources.	Relevant assessment and care strategies are presented. One (1) person- centred AND one (1) family/carer centred strategy to support terminal phase are presented. Poorly linked to one (1) National Palliative Care Standard. Information supported by a minimum of four (4) credible nursing related sources.	Non relevant assessment and care strategies are presented. Either one (1) person-centred OR one (1) family/carer centred strategy to support terminal phase discussed. OR assessment and care strategies are not presented. Poorly or not linked to one (1) National Palliative Care Standard. Information supported by less than 4 credible sources. No nursing related sources included.
	General legal and ethical considerations at end-of-life 10%	8.5 -10	7.5 – 8.4	6.5 – 7.4	5 – 6.4	0 – 4.9
		Comprehensive and concise presentation of one (1) legal AND one (1) ethical care consideration at end of life. Information supported by a wide range of relevant and credible nursing related sources.	Well-developed and concise presentation of one (1) legal AND one (1) ethical care consideration at end of life. Information supported by a range of relevant and credible nursing related sources.	Clear presentation of a minimum of one (1) legal AND one (1) ethical care consideration at end of life. Information supported by mostly credible nursing related sources.	Clear presentation of one (1) legal AND one (1) ethical care consideration at end of life. Information supported by a minimum of two (2) credible nursing related sources.	Only legal OR ethical considerations discussed. OR neither legal nor ethical considerations are discussed. Information supported by less than two (2) credible sources. No nursing related sources included.
Summary and Key points 10%		8.5 -10	7.5 – 8.4	6.5 – 7.4	5 – 6.4	0 – 4.9
Summary and Key points 10%	Clear and highly relevant key points summarised for the audience. Strongly linked back to learning outcomes from the introduction.	Clear and relevant key points summarised for the audience. Linked back to learning outcomes from the introduction.	Clear key points summarised for the audience. Linked back to learning outcomes from the introduction.	Key points identified for audience. Not well linked to learning outcomes from introduction.	Points summarised are not relevant or not provided. Not linked to learning outcomes.

Criterion (Weighting)	HD (85-100%)	DI (75-84%)	CR (65-74%)	PA (50-64%	NN (<50%)
Presentation 5%	8.5 -10	7.5 – 8.4	6.5 – 7.4	5 – 6.4	0 – 4.9
Presentation 5%	Presented in a clear, voice, using appropriate terminology and within time limit. Slides are highly appealing, and images add value to the topic.	Presented clearly using appropriate terminology. Slides are appealing, and images relevant to the topic.	Presentation can be understood and terminology mostly appropriate. Slides are clear, and images mostly relevant to the topic.	Presentation can be understood, but style and terminology detract from message. Slides are legible, and images are not relevant to the topic. .	Presentation cannot be understood easily. Incorrect use of terminology. Slides are not legible, and images are not relevant to the topic.
APA referencing Style 5%	Accurate use of APA referencing style on all occasions:slides, oral narration and reference list (no errors).	Accurate use of APA referencing style on most occasions: slides, oral narration and reference list (1-2 errors).	Accurate use of APA referencing style on some occasions: slides, oral narration and reference list (3-4 errors).	Accurate use of APA referencing style on a few occasions: slides, oral narration and reference list (5-6 errors).	Substantial inaccuracies with APA referencing style: slides, oral narration and reference list (>7 errors) OR APA referencing style not attempted.

NRSG374 AT1 Rubric: Professional Development Resource.

Topic

Subject

Date

Pages

+61 2 1234 5678