Subject Name:

Business Information Analysis

Subject Code:

BIS7101

Assessment Title

A3 Project

Submission Method

Canvas

Subject Learning Outcomes addressed:

SLO1: Identify and critically assess complex business problems in terms of analytical models.

SLO2: Apply appropriate analytical methods to find creative and innovative solutions to business problems.

SLO3: Demonstrate critical and ethical decision-making in complex business situations.

Submission Date:

Week 12

Weight

40%

Limitation(s)

Word count 2500

You are advised that any submissions past the due date without an approved extension or without approved extenuating circumstances incurs a 5% penalty of the total weight per calendar day.

Criterion

SLO

Mastery (HD)

Proficient (D)

Developing (C)

Emerging (P)

Needs Improvement (N)

Introduction and Background

1,2

C 3

The introduction clearly identifies and articulates the problem or issue being analysed.

The background information and context are thoroughly explained and provide a comprehensive understanding of the problem.

The introduction adequately identifies and articulates the problem or issue being analysed.

The background information and context are explained sufficiently to provide a reasonable understanding of the problem.

The introduction identifies the problem or issue being analyzed, but it may lack clarity or depth.

The background information and context are provided, but there may be some gaps or inconsistencies

The introduction may lack clear identification or articulation of the problem or issue being analysed.

The background information and context are limited or insufficient, making it difficult to understand the problem

The introduction fails to identify or articulate the problem or issue being analyzed.

The background information and context are absent or inadequate.

Methodology and Data Analysis

1,2

C 3

The methodology is appropriate and clearly described, including the data collection method.

The analysis techniques used are appropriate and effectively applied to the data. The data analysis is presented accurately and objectively.

The methodology is adequate and described sufficiently, including the data collection method.

The analysis techniques used are mostly appropriate and applied reasonably well to the data. The data analysis is presented reasonably accurately and objectively

The methodology is provided but may lack some clarity or detail, including the data collection method.

The analysis techniques used may have some limitations or inconsistencies. The data analysis is presented with some accuracy but may lack objectivity.

The methodology is weakly described, and the data collection method may be inadequate or poorly explained.

The analysis techniques used may be inappropriate or poorly applied to the data. The data analysis may lack accuracy and objectivity.

The methodology is absent or inadequately described, and the data collection method is missing or insufficiently explained.

The analysis techniques used are inappropriate or not applied to the data. The data analysis is inaccurate and lacks objectivity

Findings and Results

1,2

C 3

The findings and results are presented clearly and concisely.

They are supported by relevant evidence, examples, and data. The findings directly address the problem or issue being analysed

The findings and results are presented reasonably clearly and concisely.

They are supported by relevant evidence, examples, and data to a satisfactory extent. The findings mostly address the problem or issue being analyzed.

The findings and results may lack clarity or conciseness.

They are supported by some relevant evidence, examples, and data, but there may be some gaps or inconsistencies. The findings partially address the problem or issue being analysed.

The findings partially address the problem or issue being analysed.

P (50-64%): The findings and results may lack clarity and conciseness, making them difficult to understan. The support with relevant evidence, examples, and data is limited or weak. The findings minimally address the problem or issue being analysed.

The findings and results are absent or inadequately presented.

There is little to no support with relevant evidence, examples, and data. The findings do not address the problem or issue being analysed.

Writing Style and Clarity

1,2 C 3

The writing style is clear, concise, and appropriate for the target audience.

The language used effectively communicates ideas and concepts. The report is free from grammatical errors, typos, and other writing mistakes.

The writing style is generally clear, concise, and appropriate for the target audience.

The language used effectively communicates ideas and concepts for the most part. The report has minor grammatical errors, typos, or other writing mistakes

The writing style may lack consistency or clarity in some sections.

The language used adequately communicates ideas and concepts, although some improvements could be made. The report has noticeable grammatical errors, typos, or other writing mistakes.

The writing style is weak and lacks clarity in several sections.

The language used may be unclear or confusing, hindering the communication of ideas and concepts. The report has significant grammatical errors, typos, or other writing mistakes.

The writing style is severely deficient, making the report difficult to understand.

The language used is unclear or inappropriate for the target audience. The report has numerous grammatical errors, typos, or other writing mistakes.

Conclusions and Recommendations

1,2

C 3

The conclusions are logical and supported by the analysis and findings.

The recommendations are practical, actionable, and based on the analysis and evaluation. The report discusses the potential implications and consequences of the conclusions and recommendations

The conclusions are generally logical and supported by the analysis and findings.

The recommendations are practical and based on the analysis and evaluation. The report discusses the potential implications and consequences of the conclusions and recommendations to a satisfactory extent

may lack some logical coherence or may not be fully supported by the analysis and findings.

The recommendations are partially practical and based on the analysis and evaluation. The report partially discusses the potential implications and consequences of the conclusions and recommendations

The conclusions may lack logical coherence or may not be adequately supported by the analysis and findings.

The recommendations may be weak or not fully based on the analysis and evaluation. The report minimally discusses the potential implications and consequences of the conclusions and recommendations

The conclusions are absent or illogical, lacking any support from the analysis and findings.

The recommendations are absent or inappropriate. The report does not discuss the potential implications and consequences of the conclusions and recommendations